Skip to main content

The medium is the message

The Indian Premier League (IPL) 2012 opened with much anticipation and excitement last week. 
This is a cricket tournament – but not as we know it. There are cheerleaders, ‘strategic time-outs’ (aka – extended commercial breaks) and a six-is-not-a-six, but a ‘DLF six’ (and well it should be; since DLF – an Indian property development company – reportedly paid $40 million for the privilege of being the tournament’s primary sponsor).
The teams (franchises, as they call themselves) are brought together in an American football style draught, where the big names are bought for huge sums of money.  Will you see Kevin Pietersen churning out runs for Surrey in the early English county season? No – he’s otherwise occupied, raking in a cool £750,000 for a month’s stint with the Delhi Daredevils.
Meanwhile, this week that ancient institution of cricket – the Wisden Almanac – was published in its 149th edition. Its editor Lawrence Booth has written about the challenges that the IPL, together with the increasing power of the Indian Board in the international cricketing community, hold for the game. The IPL, he argues, is a Pandora’s Box masquerading as a panacea: "The disintegration of India's feted batting lineup has coincided with the rise of a Twenty20-based nationalism, the growth of private marketeers and high level conflicts of interest. It is a perfect storm. And the global game sits steadily in the eye.”
There are two reasons why the IPL exists: the insatiable appetite for cricket in India, and the opportunity that this creates for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to make a huge profit. Sponsorship income and the sale of broadcasting rights will bring the BCCI an estimated $1.6 billion in the next 10 years.
But the spectacle, argues Booth, threatens the institutions of the game, and perhaps the game itself. The contest offers the superficial excitement of four-hits, six-hits, and quick wickets, but the games are tactically uncomplicated. More often than not, you know who will win by the end of the first few overs of the second innings. It is simultaneously far quicker than other formats (and far easier to televise), but ironically far more boring.
It’s reminiscent of Marshall McLuhan’s argument in the 1960s:
“The medium, or process of our time – electric technology – is reshaping and restructuring patterns of social interdependence and every aspect of our personal life. It is forcing us to reconsider and re-evaluate practically every thought, every action, and every institution formerly taken for granted. Everything is changing – you, your family, your neighbourhood, your education, your job, your government, your relation to "the others." And they're changing dramatically.”
Cricket is being reshaped dramatically by television, but television is a technology of the 20th century. Author Douglas Copeland, who has written a biography of McLuhan, has wondered what will come of the “fluid melting world of texting, email, YouTube, Google, smartphones and reality TV... What will be the psychic fallout of these technologies on our inner lives?”
And not just our inner lives, but our public lives – our lives together. Cricket was hard to televise, and therefore to monetise, so they changed it. The word ‘friend’ means something different after the advent of Facebook, and ‘follower’ means something different after the advent of Twitter.
In Desiring the Kingdom, theologian James KA Smith argues that the Christian community has been too ‘Cartesian’, giving attention to having the right concepts, and too little attention to how a world full “secular liturgies” – which are “fundamentally formative, and implicit in them is a vision of the Kingdom that needs to be discerned and evaluated. From the perspective of Christian faith, these secular liturgies will often constitute a mis-formation of our desires – aiming our hearts away from the Creator…” Our heads and hearts often follow our hands, not the other way round. Or as Jesus put it, if your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light. 
Our information-rich age is shaping us, our institutions, our language, and our relationships - and not in ways which are consonant with Christian worship and community.
It needs saying… it’s just a shame that, at 168 characters, it’s too long to tweet. 

Paul Bickley, theos - Evangelical Alliance


Popular posts from this blog

When God turns a deaf ear on prayers

Does God always hear people’s prayers, or do some pray in vain thinking that God hears them, when in reality He chooses to turn a deaf hear to their cries? Some may perhaps have a notion that all prayers are worthy, and God being who He is is by nature willing to listen and hear their prayers delightfully. They entertain the notion that it is their birth right for God to listen to their prayers and answer them accordingly. Also, there are some who come before the presence of the Lord with severe doubts, defeated by the devils whisper that they are such an unworthy soul that for them to lift up their cries to the Lord is an abomination. They are mute by their own wickedness, depressed and thus fail to pray.

What does the scripture say about God turning a deaf hear to prayers? It is to be said that God is sovereign and can choose to answer any prayer as He sees fit. He is altogether happy and never backed into a corner, God always does whatever He pleases for He is free to do as He wills…

What does it mean to live a godly life?

If you ever asked yourself the question, what does it mean to live a godly life? and if your not exactly sure what living a godly life involves, this extract taking from Charles Seet book 'A Christian in a non-Christian world' provides ample guidance on just what to do.

Now it is worth asking the question then, 'What does it mean to live godly?' It does not mean that we are just to confine ourselves within a set of rules and regulations. Some people reduce godly living to a list of 'do’s and don'ts.' But the meaning of godly living goes far deeper than that.

Godly living means living in the manner that God wants us to live. It means having the same feelings, attitudes and heart's desires that God has. It means that we love the things that God loves, care for the things that God cares for, and dislike those things which He dislikes. And since God loves righteousness, a godly person also loves righteousness. Since God hates sin, a godly person also hates …

Women of the Bible: Adah and Zillah

The Sin of Adam and Eve resulted in the fall of humanity. Every generation after them became wicked and that is why scripture affirms, ‘that there is no one righteous, no, not even one.’ Mankind became enslave to the passions of its flesh, its desires became its ruler and men followed the natural dictates of their hearts; and were it not for Sovereign grace, the race of men would now only be read of by angels in the library of extinct creatures. Adam and Eve witnessed the consequences of their sin in the death of their beloved son, Abel, by the hands of Cain who murdered his brother in anger and was thus sent away from the presence of God. My dear sisters, sin is not only sin when it is found in its extremes, sin is also sin in its subtlety and vanity. Sin is sin when one's affection is set on another and not on God, when one lives to please a thing or a being which is not God; this is also sin.
This becomes especially evident in the lives of Adah and Zillah the wives of Lamech. Th…